England and Australia get their second 5-0

A round-up of the key numbers from the final ODI at Old Trafford as England’s spinners again come to the fore

Bharath Seervi24-Jun-2018 90 – Difference between Jos Buttler’s score (110*) and the second-highest score in England’s innings (20). Alex Hales and Adil Rashid both made 20. The 10 batsmen combined to put on only 86 runs with six boundaries compared to Buttler’s 110 with 13 boundaries.ESPNcricinfo Ltd 94 – Runs added by England’s last two wickets, the third-most for any side in a successful chase. Buttler and Rashid added 81 runs for the ninth wicket while Jake Ball and Buttler shared 13 runs. The most runs scored by last two wickets to win an ODI is 136 by Sri Lanka, also against Australia, in 2010-11. The previous best for England was 50 runs against Pakistan in 1987. 108.00 – Buttler’s average across all formats since the start of May. In 14 innings comprising of the IPL, Tests and ODIs, he has scored 864 runs including a century and nine fifties. He had scored five fifties for the Royals in last six IPL games, hit two fifties in three innings in the Test series against Pakistan and now two fifties and a hundred in this ODI series. He has hit fifty-plus in five of the six chases in IPL and ODIs in these two months.

Spinners from both sides in this series

Team Wkts Ave Econ SR 3+ wktsEngland 24 25.16 5.55 27.10 5Australia 5 79.59 5.60 85.20 0 24 – Wickets by England’s spinners in this series – their most ever in any ODI series. Rashid and Moeen Ali both picked 12 wickets each. On the other hand, Australia’s spinners could manage only five wickets at average of 79.60. 2 – Number of times England have whitewashed their oppositions in a five-match series. The previous one was against Zimbabwe way back in 2001-02. 2 – Whitewashes suffered by Australia in bilateral series of five or more matches, and both have come in the last two years. They lost to South Africa the same way in 2016-17 before this defeat. In 38 such series before this, they had never faced a 5-0 defeat. With this defeat, Australia have suffered 16 losses in their last 18 completed ODIs.

Sarfraz Ahmed: The Pakistan captain who's yet to take the lead

He was widely credited for his role in the Champions Trophy win, but Pakistan’s wicketkeeper has struggled to make his mark on the Test team

Osman Samiuddin at Lord's23-May-2018Eleven months ago, Sarfraz Ahmed stood on the balcony of his house in North Karachi and we caught a passing glimpse of that which he is waiting to become. A small part of a big city – his constituency let’s call it – was massed below him on the street, rapt and united in adulation and celebration.Sarfraz has lived in that same house his entire life. The area is known as Buffer Zone (don’t ask). There were neighbours in that crowd and people who had known him and seen him grow up who may have realised at some point that he was special but who, until then, may not have realised quite how apart from them he could become.Somebody in the crowd started singing and Sarfraz eventually joined in this exquisite trolling of the trope of India’s dominance of Pakistan. Let’s agree that he’ll never be a dancer but in playing along, he gave this charged, jubilant scene the definition it had been seeking: a leader among his people, as one of them, but also apart from them.Today, a day on from his 31st birthday, a week on from the worst Test he has had personally, a day before the biggest examination of his fledgling Test captaincy, he is Pakistan’s undisputed captain but is still waiting to become their leader.***Nobody really knows what makes the perfect captain and if they tell you they do, don’t buy it. The one thing we do know – and in the case of Pakistan, the foremost prerequisite – is that, without performing himself, a captain is as pointless as a celebrity without an Insta account. Runs are what established Misbah. The example that Imran set is what made his side great. And runs are what smoothed the prickliness of Miandad.If it used to be complicated for wicketkeeper-captains, it isn’t anymore: they need to score runs like anyone else. Sarfraz knows it because, until he became captain, he was scoring runs. And they weren’t just runs – they were crisis runs, mood-shifting runs, runs for fun.On the 2016 tour to England, in fact, there were a handful of Test 40s considerably more significant than just their sum. And he bossed the ODI series. Those were the peak years, from the start of 2014 and his hand in the Sharjah chase, to the lost-cause fifties in Australia at the end of 2016.The batting hasn’t hurtled off a cliff since, but it has begun to trek down it. There was that fifty against Sri Lanka in the Champions Trophy on which the tournament turned (albeit he was helped on his way by Thisara Perera and his missed sitter at mid-on). The hand-eye coordination that can make his offside game so thrilling is now occasionally revealing the risks that make it appear wafty. The urgency that was so vibrant has, a couple of times already, looked hasty.Sarfraz Ahmed greets crowds outside his house in Karachi•AFPAnd then there’s the noose by which all wicketkeepers eventually hang. So deep are the scars of Kamran Akmal upon Pakistan that for a long time, anyone who could identify which gloves go on which hand was a good keeper. But we’re reaching a moment in Sarfraz’s wicketkeeping – and actually we’ve been here for a while. According to ESPNcricinfo’s records, Sarfraz has missed at least 19 chances in 26 Tests since the start of 2015. He’s dropped or missed 11 catches out of a total of 93 opportunities, but more damningly, has missed eight stumpings out of 19 that have come his way. All in all, that means he is missing roughly one in every six chances. Those are not figures to sweep away easily.Carry on like this for a while and it starts building up into a fair old storm. Everything gets sucked into it, like the constant haranguing of players. Some days, such as the third T20 in New Zealand earlier this year when he was shouting at Mohammad Amir to stop appealing and just pick the damn ball up to prevent a single, it’s okay. That is the alertness to match situations that is intrinsic to Sarfraz’s game.Other days, such as when he ran up to lecture Hasan Ali on his way back to the bowling mark only to be, apparently, ignored, it is OCD micromanagement. And the berating of fielders for poor throws … it’s not a great look if he’s dropping chances himself.Eventually the whispers about his fitness might gather the strength to become actual criticism. He is passing those fitness tests and working hard, no question. But he doesn’t look like the poster boy for the no-prisoners-taken fitness regime they’re trying to implement. And as the captain, you’d think he should be the poster boy.***The thing is, whether the PCB intended it as such or not, Sarfraz has been a captain-in-waiting for years. He’s the closest the board has come to grooming a captain from an early age. Sure, there have been bumps along the way, but he was Under-19 captain just over a decade ago and he is now the national captain in all three formats. That is as straight a line of leadership development as you’ll find in Pakistan cricket.And there’s no questioning that, under his command, Pakistan’s white-ball sides have, at the very least, halted an alarming slide and, at the most, turned into a modern outfit. And no matter how he can be with his players on the field, from a distance it does appear as if he has pulled off that other great captaincy trick – of appearing to be one of the boys while at the same time not.There’s a tale from that Champions Trophy win with which to finish. After the opening defeat to India and heading into their next training session at Edgbaston, Pakistan sat down in the dressing room for a bit of soul-searching. Words were needed – tough, unsparing words. Mickey Arthur had been dishing them out thus far but he now needed it to come from the players. The player who got up to kick that verbal ass? Shoaib Malik.Or, to put it more relevantly, not Sarfraz: the captain no question, but a leader in waiting.

Will India play an extra batsman in the second Test?

While India will be eager to fix their batting-order issues, they will be without Jasprit Bumrah for the second Test too

Nagraj Gollapudi at Lord's07-Aug-20180:47

The less Pandya bowls, the better for India – Arun

On the eve of the first Test at Edgbaston, both KL Rahul and Cheteshwar Pujara inspected the pitch at opposite ends, one after the other. Rahul bowed to the pitch and touched his heart, an Indian form of paying obeisance to things sacred. Pujara pressed his palm to inspect the hardness. At that point both men were in contention for a berth in the Indian top order. The next day, Pujara shook Rahul’s hands to congratulate him for getting into the team while he himself sat out.Bumrah ruled out of second Test

Jaspirt Bumrah is not going to play in the second Test at Lord’s, India’s bowling coach has confirmed. Although Bumrah has been bowling across the training sessions starting with the warm-up match in Essex, he still has the brace protecting the left thumb that he injured in India’s first T20 against Ireland on June 27.
While including Bumrah in the 18-man squad for the first three Tests, the BCCI had mentioned that the fast bowler would be “available for selection from the second Test onwards based on his fitness”. On Tuesday, at the team’s first training session after the first Test, Bumrah bowled to the lower order.
Bowling coach Bharat Arun said Bumrah is out of contention although he is “bowling fit”. Arun pointed out that Bumrah’s match fitness could only be verified once he bowled without the brace on his hand.

Two days out from the second Test, it will not be so fanciful to think both men will play at Lord’s. Only because the one glaring weakness that got exposed for India was their weak batting outside of Virat Kohli, who scored 200 runs alone while the rest of the 10 men managed only 214.But why pick Pujara after his poor form in county cricket that adds no weightage to his selection? Look at this way: Pujara has more county experience than anyone in India’s batting line-up and understands the conditions better than anybody. Yes, runs and form are good metrics to measure the worth, but experience also counts.The Lord’s pitch has a screen of faint green across the length. Although London was burning on Tuesday morning after a heatwave in the preceding days, the forecast for the first four days of the match is for cooler temperatures in the early twenties with the odd shower. In that case, the idea of playing two spinners might not materialise.If Pujara does play, whom does he come in for? Maybe Hardik Pandya, who has always been picked as a batting allrounder. Even at Edgbaston, Pandya bowled 10 overs in the first innings and did not bowl in the second at all. In the four Tests Pandya has played overseas this year, he has bowled 61 overs and has taken just three wickets at an average of nearly 70 and strike rate of 122. Is that a strong enough contribution from an allrounder?Asked if India would consider playing an extra batsman at Lord’s, their bowling coach Bharat Arun did not give a conclusive answer. “Playing an extra batsman here, I would consider that as a very conservative move,” he said at a media conference. “Everything depends on the conditions. And if the conditions are not as friendly as it was during the first Test it would make more sense to play five bowlers.”But is it really that conservative? By playing an extra batsman you are reinforcing your batting department, your weak area. You are also not chopping and changing constantly, giving the batsmen more security about their spots. Shikhar Dhawan, Rahul and Ajinkya Rahane would have been disappointed by the way they were out at least once at Edgbaston, but being the first match of the series, they can be given more chances.At the same time, India cannot afford to wait for too long for them to strike form. They need to secure the batting order and Pujara offers them that option. As for the question of where Pujara could bat, he could come in at No. 5 or 6 and face the second new ball, or Rahul could be pushed down the order and Pujara could take his usual No. 3 spot. After all, India head coach Ravi Shastri told ESPNcricinfo during the Essex match to be ready for “surprises”, saying the Indian middle order would be flexible.The question is, will India be “conservative” and flexible? Or will they stick to status quo?

Australia's batting: square pegs into round holes?

Barring injury, Australia’s bowling attack and wicketkeeper are nailed on for the first Test against India but the same can’t be said about the top order

Alex Malcolm21-Nov-2018

The incumbents

Aaron FinchAt the end of the Test series in the UAE Finch appeared a lock for the first Test against India but he has hit a significant form slump in ODIs and T20s since. Scores of 1, 0, 3, 1, 5, 41, 11, and 7 have caused alarm and he has spoken of the challenges the change in formats have posed to his technique. He only has three T20s and one Shield match to find some touch. Further complicating matters, his record opening the batting in first-class cricket in Australia is poor. He was well suited to opening on the low slow surfaces in the UAE but Australian conditions are a different beast and very few makeshift openers have succeeded in Australia in Test match cricket. Most of his success in first-class cricket for Victoria has come batting at No.5. He looks certain to play. Where he bats is still to be finalised. Victoria coach Andrew McDonald told radio on Wednesday that he was planning to bat Finch in the middle order against Queesland and had not received any instructions from the selectors over where to bat him.Usman KhawajaFitness is the only question mark for Australia’s best batsman. He had surgery to repair a meniscus tear in his knee on October 23. He is back running and replicated some running between the wickets over the weekend. He was set to face bowlers for the first time this week. The last Shield round before the Test starts on November 27 and he expects to be fit for that. If all goes to plan he will play in Adelaide. He should bat at No.3 but there may be some consideration given to him opening in light of his excellent record at the top of the order.Shaun MarshAny doubts about his Test place have been erased. His form since returning home has been sublime. He made 80 and 98 in Shield match against Tasmania at the WACA where the bowlers dominated. He followed that with a supreme 106 against a high-quality South Africa ODI attack in Hobart. Eight days later Marsh peeled off 163 not out to help Western Australia chase down 313 against South Australia at Adelaide Oval, the venue of the opening Test against India and the scene of a century against England last year. The four failures in the UAE are a world away. Despite his success at No.5 in last summer’s Ashes, on current form he is the best equipped to bat in the pivotal spot while Steven Smith is absent.Travis HeadLike Finch, Head showed promise in the UAE and appeared almost certain to retain his place in Adelaide. But like Finch, his form since has given the selectors pause. He was strategically left out of Australia’s T20 assignments. He missed out in his only Shield innings before a nightmare one-day series against South Africa put his Test place under pressure. That may have eased somewhat with a good Shield performance in Adelaide against WA where made a fluent 87 in the first innings and was unfortunate to be lbw. He was equally unlucky to be strangled down the leg side in the second innings for 0. The lack of runs from the other contenders has helped his cause but conversely the ability of South Africa’s paceman to expose him technically, albeit in short-form cricket, has meant a home Test in Adelaide is not absolutely guaranteed.

The bolters

Glenn Maxwell has gone from a contender post the UAE series to a genuine outsider to be picked for Adelaide. The schedule of T20s, ODIs and T20s have done him no favours. But his inability to make some sound situational decisions at the crease saw him slide further down the order in the ODIs and as a result he has slid right out of Test calculations for the time being.
Marcus Stoinis started the season superbly in both 50-over and Shield cricket and his stocks continued to rise during the ODI series against South Africa. But his overall body of work doesn’t stack up against some of the other options with just four first-class hundreds to his name and none in the last two Shield seasons.
Alex Doolan has been a forgotten man. He played four Tests in 2014 and scored 89 on debut at Centurion against an attack of Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and Vernon Philander but was dumped on the tour of the UAE and never considered again. He is the stand out batsman this season with scores of 115, 10, 76, 6, 53, 90, 0 and 94 putting him in contention.
Tom Cooper would be a surprise selection but he has scored back-to-back Shield centuries this season, including 178, against Queensland. Langer asked for hundreds and Cooper has provided them.

Mitchell MarshAustralia’s new vice-captain remains a divisive figure. After the failures in the UAE the 27-year-old was left out of Australia’s matches against South Africa and the T20 series against India to get valuable time in Shield cricket. It was the clearest indication that he is still a mainstay in Australia’s Test team. He made a statement scoring 151 batting at No.4 against Queensland and he also bowled 30 overs in the match claiming the wicket of Marnus Labuschagne. He followed that a second innings 44 against South Australia which was vital in the context of the game but Daniel Worrall did breach his defence in the same manner Mohammad Abbas had in the UAE. He looks likely to play given the Australian attack will need extra bowling support but unlikely to bat higher than No.6.Marnus LabuschagneDespite some promising performances in the two Tests in the UAE having been picked seemingly on potential, he appears likely to miss out on Adelaide. Like Matt Renshaw, his Shield form has not helped his cause with scores of 3, 28, 10, 11, 52 and 4 perhaps forcing the selectors hands despite the half-century coming against Australia’s Test attack. Given what he showed in the UAE with bat, ball and in the field, a case could be made to stick with him long-term. But Australia’s dire results of recent time may not allow for such long-term thinking.

The contenders

Matt RenshawAfter his omission in the UAE he appeared almost certain to open the batting in Adelaide but his form has not made his selection a certainty. He made an unbeaten 145 on immediate return from the UAE for his premier cricket team Toombul in Brisbane and made another on November 10 but his Shield form has been far less productive. He was dismissed for 3 and 0 against South Australia in Adelaide by both an inswinger and outswinger from Joe Mennie. He made 89 and 21 against WA on an Allan Border Field surface where two players made scores of 150 plus and six others made half-centuries. He followed that with 21 and 6 against the Test attack, nicking Nathan Lyon in the first innings and being adjudged caught behind attempting to cut Josh Hazlewood in the second.Marcus HarrisThe left-hander has put himself firmly in the mix for Adelaide through not only a great start to the domestic season but solid performances over the previous two years. No man has scored more runs or centuries in Shield cricket since the start of the 2016-17 season than Harris. He announced himself with 250 not out against New South Wales and has backed that up with scores of 65 and 67 in the next two games. He stands up under pressure, with two of his nine first-class hundreds coming in Sheffield Shield finals. The 26-year-old has matured into a very dependable opener for Victoria, and any queries over his ability to bat time and make sound decisions consistently have been quashed this season.Peter HandscombHe remains in the frame after he was omitted from the UAE squad on form. His JLT Cup run was excellent and he produced an impressive Shield century against South Australia at the MCG. But he has left a few starts on the table with scores of just 27, 48 and 23 in conditions where team-mates have made significant scores. The selectors will have taken particular note of his move up to No.3 for Victoria. It has been a wise move to put his technique under pressure against the quicks up front, which has been the question mark against him. Whether he’s done enough for a recall remains to be seen.Joe BurnsAfter mysteriously dropping off the radar for the UAE series he has re-emerged as a contender for Adelaide. In a team crying out for experience, his three Test hundreds opening the batting in Australia and New Zealand certainly count in his favour. He also debuted against India last time they toured, making twin half-centuries in Sydney, and his excellent Shield season last summer should stand for something. His Shield form this season won’t count against him but he hasn’t smashed down the door. He made 64 against South Australia but was one of Lloyd Pope’s seven victims, then made 49 and 80 not out in Brisbane against WA albeit on a road. He copped a poor decision in the first innings against NSW but then did all the hard work on the third evening against Hazlewood, Starc, Cummins and Lyon only to edge a ball first up on the fourth morning to be out for 38.Matthew WadeHe has become a legitimate contender to play in Adelaide as a specialist batsman. England have proven two wicketkeepers can play together in a successful side. He made three centuries last Shield season, the equal most of any player, and has started this summer with four consecutive Shield half-centuries and 137 against the best Shield attack in the country, Victoria. He has two Test hundreds and one came batting at No.6. Tasmania captain George Bailey believes he should be considered given how well he is batting at the moment, particularly his ability to bat with the tail and shift up and down the gears depending on the match situation.

Kohli's focus the next lesson for carefree Pant

The pitch, the opposition, the heat were all peripheral to Kohli’s single-minded pursuit of runs – while Pant made batting fun to watch

Alagappan Muthu in Rajkot05-Oct-2018There was a scramble in the crowd as soon as the second Indian wicket fell. They had barely moved from the little pockets of shade afforded by the second tier stands in Rajkot, but now they careened into the sunshine, phones out, hands waving, and smiles as bright as the sun.Virat Kohli was coming out to bat.He wouldn’t have seen the stir he caused. The man gets into a zone when he’s batting where only he, the ball, and his routines exist. He came down the dressing room steps fiddling with his gear. Then he touched the turf, held the hand to his heart. Whether he asked for a hundred or not, he looked destined for it.Kohli’s made better runs before; tougher runs; more meaningful runs, but his 139 against West Indies was the perfect advertisement of the one quality that makes him a modern-day great. Keeping the noise out.His innings began when the spotlight was on Prithvi Shaw, who was busy making batting look easier than breathing. Kohli was new to the crease. He would need time to understand the pace of the pitch and the kinds of shots he could play. He waited until the 17th delivery for his first boundary – a risk-less straight drive against an inviting half-volley.Kohli spent 230 deliveries in the middle. Yet, according to Cricviz, his innings included only five false shots. This is where India’s captain towers over his peers. He puts in the work to get set and then rarely gives it away.Leading up to his dismissal, he was playing shots as if a voice inside his head was giving him imaginary targets to hit. “Long-off”. He turned a length ball into a half-volley with a superb stride. “Midwicket”. Hit against the turn off legspinner Devendra Bishoo. “Straight of midwicket”. The auto-pilot flick, head over the ball, wrists working smoothly. It all seemed like indulgence; as if he was treating himself for all the time he didn’t play an extravagant shot when he very well could have.

And why did he wait until he had over 100 to put on a show? Because that’s how Test cricket is played. That’s how Test matches are won. The docile pitch. The quality of opposition. The heat. All of it is peripheral to a batsman. His job is to give himself the best chance to make runs. Kohli does it better than most; so much so that sometimes it can be boring to sit through one of his innings.Rishabh Pant, on the other hand…Watching India’s wicketkeeper bat is really really fun. So is just watching his actual bat, and the places it ends up. He just swings it hard, often throwing himself off balance in the process. But because of the speed he generates with his hands, he gets the power he needs to find the boundary. It’s an incredible method; ridiculously popular in gully cricket. Yet here it is, on the international stage, yielding big runs.Check out his pictures from the IPL, and all the weird positions he ends up in. He’d whack the ball so hard that even when he wanted to clear the infield at cover, he’d look like he was slogging. He only just avoids keeling over as he thunders down the track to smack one over midwicket. And when he sweeps, phew, that bat could teach windmills a thing or two.It takes confidence to play like that and Pant has so much he should think about a side-business curing people with an inferiority complex. He had a Test hundred for the taking in Rajkot, a second in as many innings and the title of the first India wicketkeeper to pull off such a sequence. He swung hard, as he does. Swung against the turn, which was not so good. Got out for 92. Eight more runs and the birthday party from last night could have got a second wind.It’s a small mistake in light of the position India are in, but it is the kind that can be avoided, as Kohli keeps showing. He’s got to 1000 runs for a third year in a row by cutting out silly mistakes. People around the world know his weakness outside the off stump, but to exploit it, the pitch needs to be helpful, the bowler needs to know how to swing the ball, the team needs to show discipline and only after that does the edge come and then it needs to be caught.Those are long odds.The odds on a Kohli century: right now, it’s one every five innings.

'I knew if I scored a century against Australia I'd have a big future'

Sri Lanka batsman Kusal Mendis on learning to build an innings, and dealing with criticism on social media

Interview by Andrew Fidel Fernando04-Jan-2019You’ve said in the past that it was your father who lit your passion for cricket. What do you remember of those early days?
My father loves cricket, so he’s the one who introduced me to it. He played Under-13 and U-15 cricket, so he was pretty keen that I play it as well. He sent me for coaching with Jayalath Aponso sir, who worked with the academy in Moratuwa [Mendis’ home town, just south of Colombo] and that was where my cricket started to change. If a foreign team came over, he’d make sure I was in the squad and playing those games.Your father was a three-wheeler driver, I hear. He must have had to make some sacrifices to get you into the game?
He was a carpenter, actually, but then he had an accident and wasn’t able to physically continue in that line of work. Then he started driving a three-wheeler. We got lots of help from our extended family – aunties and uncles. When I went on tours at the age-group level, I was able to make sure we had all the costs covered. There were many times when my father would go into debt to make sure I had the gear I needed. There were a few bats that he bought like that. He didn’t tell me any of that. He just bought me what I asked for. He must have hoped that one day I’d come a long way in cricket. My mother was always encouraging as well. It took everybody’s support – grandparents, teachers, coaches, everyone, but it’s my father who I have to be most thankful for. He must be really pleased about how far I have come. Even though he doesn’t tell me, he must be really happy.

Former Sri Lanka coach Graham Ford said that when you got into the team as a 20-year-old, you already had a very good technique. How did that develop?
Because my father had played cricket when he was younger, he trained me when I was young. I remember times at the cement nets in the Moratuwa stadium where people would yell at my father for throwing the ball at me so hard. They thought I was too little to handle pace bowling like that. But he kept bowling to me with the hard ball and helped me get rid of that fear of the ball and of fast bowling. Then after that, it was my coaches who gave me that foundation, in terms of technique.Because you were scoring so heavily at school level, you were a pretty well-known name. You had a taste of fame at a young age. How did that affect you?
When you see your name and your photo in the newspaper or on TV, it gives you a buzz. You’re at U-17 and U-19 level when those kinds of things can mean a lot to you. Not that they don’t make me happy now. I always wanted to get to that next level, though, where my matches were being shown on TV. I didn’t think I would get to that stage as young as age 20. Around 23-24 was my target.

“The Australians are more aggressive than everyone else. They bowl in a more attacking way, their fields are more aggressive, and they attack with their words as well. Everything is designed to try and make us freeze”

You had barely played senior cricket when you came to the international level. Was that scary?
There was a little fear. But the people in the team really made me feel at ease. I remember in my first innings against West Indies. Dhammika Prasad was on the boundary cheering every single shot I played. Almost every single ball! That kind of thing put me at ease. There are others in the team who made me feel really welcome. Dilruwan Perera really helped me out when it came to stuff around the team. Upul Tharanga did as well. They all helped me out so much.I also probably didn’t have enough knowledge to feel that fear, at times. I didn’t know how to build an innings at this level back then. All I knew was to go out there and hit the ball. Some deliveries that should have worried me, I was trying to hit them for four. Maybe because I had barely played first-class cricket, I didn’t have that deeper understanding of cricket. But when later I went on the England tour, I hit my first fifty and that was when I started getting some idea about how an innings can be built.ALSO READ: When I saw Angie get hit, I thought there’s no way I’m getting out – MendisSo what specifically did you learn in those first six months?
Angelo Mathews was the captain back then and Sanath Jayasuriya was the selector, and when I got out they never told me anything. There were probably many times when the team desperately needed runs from me, but I got out. They didn’t pull me up until I had played at least ten to 15 matches. All Angie told me was to play my normal game and not worry too much. I think it was the freedom that they gave me that allowed me to learn how to build an innings. There was no pressure about scoring these many runs, or playing out these many balls.

When I look at the videos from back then, I feel like I was trying to hit a lot of balls for four. After going to England, I started leaving the ball and playing it a little more according to its merit. I started understanding what the team needed from me. Thankfully they didn’t drop me through that period. They kept me in the team despite those early mistakes, which meant I could properly learn those lessons.How long did it take you to feel like a part of the team?
That didn’t come until after I hit 176 against Australia. They were the No. 1 team at the time, and if I could make a century against them, I felt as if I had a big future. To make that kind of score at that age against that kind of team – it gave me a lot of confidence. A lot of things changed for me after that innings. I felt as if I could build big innings.That innings was one of the greatest Sri Lankan knocks. What do you remember about it?
We were out cheaply in the first innings, so when I went in to bat in the second, I didn’t have any big expectations that I would score a hundred or anything. I batted quite aggressively back then – more so than now – and I middled pretty much everything that I tried. The pull shots I tried off the fast bowlers came off the bat really nicely. The sweeps went to the right place. I felt like I was making good decisions every ball, because everything was leading to good results.ALSO READ: ‘I am going to try and get 1000 every year’ – MendisThere must have been some challenges to overcome during that innings, though?
They knew that if they could get us out cheaply again, the match was theirs. At first I batted normally, but when I started scoring a few runs, they suddenly seemed to fall a little, mentally. Then, because I was scoring quickly, they tried to stop the flow of runs rather than trying to get me out, which made things easier for me.But the Australia team is more aggressive than everyone else. They bowl in a more attacking way, their fields are more aggressive, and they attack with their words as well. Everything is designed to try and make us freeze. At the start they were telling me that I was too little for them to worry about and that they’d get my wicket without any trouble. At the end of the tour, though, after we had won the series, I remember Mitchell Starc saying they would punish us when we went to their country. Other teams probably don’t say things like that.”After we won the series, Mitchell Starc said they would punish us when we went to their country”•Getty ImagesAfter that innings, people really started taking notice of you. How did that affect you?
I think there were a lot of expectations that because I had played an innings like that at a young age, I would continue playing innings just like that. I gave my best, but in the last year I wasn’t able to do well at all in one-day cricket. When you go through dips of form, you see things about you in the media.I also had a personal Facebook account back then – I don’t any more – and people would tell me things directly. I didn’t say much to them at the time, because I know how hard it is for anyone to get here and play international cricket. It got really bad, the kinds of things people said to me.ALSO READ: Kusal Mendis the dasher turns into Thilan Samaraweera cloneBut I learned a really good lesson out of that: whether I’m scoring runs or failing, I’ve got to stay at the same emotional level. If I score a hundred today, I’m the hero in Sri Lanka tomorrow. If I don’t score runs, I’m the worst player. But I can’t think about any of that – I’ve got to stay level. No matter what anyone says, good or bad, I try to ignore it. When I train, I’m doing my best to be successful and win matches for Sri Lanka. People don’t see that.You said you left Facebook for this reason?
Yes, it was Thilan Samaraweera who suggested I should do that, and I’m really thankful. We were in Bangladesh, and he said, just get out of there and stop reading what people are saying. This was a year ago. I had a lot of pressure from social media. Having left it, I’ve been able to do a lot more in terms of getting my game right. Friends sometimes send me posts, and I don’t even look at that. They are of no use to me. A lot of these people haven’t played cricket, so what they have to say to me is irrelevant. If you’re someone who has played cricket, I’d like to listen to what you say. Your job might be to create posts on the internet, ours is to win games. Now that I’ve learned that lesson, it doesn’t affect me as much.

“I didn’t know how to build an innings back then. All I knew was to go out there and hit the ball. Some deliveries that should have worried me, I was trying to hit them for four”

This is a kind of pressure previous generations of cricketers haven’t had to deal with. Is learning to deal with that a huge lesson for any young cricketer now?
I’m not saying that you should quit social media altogether. You need some social media. My manager does a lot of things for me, and if I do a post on Facebook or Instagram or Twitter, my manager handles it. There is value in it as well, because even the bat brand that you use can get publicity out of it. And when people are throwing mud, or delivering sermons or whatever, if that doesn’t affect you mentally, then that’s fine. But it did affect me mentally. I wasn’t able to handle it, if I’m being honest. People were suggesting I wasn’t playing for the team, and I was hurt because I would never do that. When people say things like that, they’ve also got to take into account: how old is the person we’re criticising? What has he done for the team in the past? Has he actually done anything worth throwing mud at him for? We don’t think about that enough. So my advice to players coming up from U-19 level would be: if you can take that kind of unfair criticism and not let it affect you, then you can stay on social media. But because I wasn’t able to do that, I got out.What sort of things really hurt you?
Just that I shouldn’t be in the team, that I’ve played enough at this level now, and that I’m not a player that will be of any use. Thilan really helped me get through all of that. He said: “Rather than letting all these other people tell you how much you are worth, measure your own worth yourself.” He told me that other people don’t really know a thing about me. That helped me get stronger.You had more criticism on social media in 2018 than any other time, and yet this is also the year in which you’ve scored 1000 Test runs.
It just shows how much of a lie it all is, doesn’t it? I’ve shown that at 23 I was able to do something like this. There’s also a chance that next year I’ll fail completely and get dropped from the team. Just because I’ve scored 1000 runs this year, maybe I won’t in the next year. I’ve got to understand that for myself and ignore everything else. A lot of people had a lot to say when I made two ducks at the Asia Cup. A lot of people would say things to me when I’d be fielding at the boundary as well.”Thilan Samaraweera told me, ‘Rather than letting all these other people tell you how much you are worth, measure your own worth yourself'”•LightRocket/Getty ImagesI’ve seen you say things back to spectators when you’re on the boundary as well.
Yeah, I have done that sometimes. I’ve yelled back when they’ve yelled at me. But then I’ve gone back into the dressing room and people have told me there’s no point in responding – just make sure you’re focused on your own game. When our own spectators treat us like that, we start feeling like the only reason they are coming to the match is to scold us. If there’s a misfield or a dropped catch, they’d hoot at us. In the last little while, it’s been like that in Sri Lanka. I’m not saying everyone is like that – there are a lot of spectators who love us. So my request is for them to help us out. Even in the media, or wherever.One thing I’ve seen in other countries, like in India, is that even when a player is failing, what goes on TV are the matches in which they have done well. They do things like that. So rather than criticising us, why not talk about when we’ve done well? Then at least that person can get through that tough spell and play well again. Sometimes a young player might not be able to handle what you’re saying, and their cricket career stops right there.With the 1000 you’ve scored in 2018, you’re up to almost 2500 Test runs now. What are your career goals?
I’m trying to score 10,000 runs in Tests and in one-dayers. But I can’t do that in one shot. I’ve got to set myself little targets along the way. I’ve got to play for Sri Lanka for eight or nine more years, at least. I’m hoping to get to 1000 runs every year, so I can get there quickly.

ESPNcricinfo Luck Index – Russell and the no-ball

The no-ball that reprieved Andre Russell ended up costing Kings XI Punjab 29 runs, according to ESPNcricinfo’s Luck Index

ESPNcricinfo stats team27-Mar-2019When Andre Russell got a second chance after being bowled off a no-ball from Mohammed Shami in the 17th over, you could sense that it would be a key event in the innings. On 3 off 5 balls at that stage, Russell went on to bludgeon 45 from the next 12 deliveries to propel Kolkata Knight Riders to 218.ESPNcricinfo LtdAccording to ESPNcricinfo’s Luck Index, which puts a quantitative value on every lucky event in a game, Russell’s reprieve helped Knight Riders score an extra 29 runs. This is calculated after taking into account the runs that the other batsmen, coming in after Russell, would have been expected to score off those 12 extra balls that Russell was lucky to face.Given that the final margin of result was only 28 runs, it could be argued that the no-ball actually cost Kings XI the match (though it’s true that both teams would have approached the second innings differently had the target been 190 instead of 219).Twenty-three of Russell’s 45 runs came off five balls from Shami, who will now surely pay extra attention to fielders inside the ring, given that the no-ball was called as Kings XI only had three inside the circle for that delivery.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe 29 extra runs that Knight Riders scored makes this the luckiest event of IPL 2019. Keep watching these pages as ESPNcricinfo tracks the luckiest and unluckiest players and teams throughout IPL 2019.

Kagiso Rabada comes of age as an IPL enforcer

Bowling yorkers may be ‘simple’ for Delhi Capitals’ main weapon, but Rabada has also shown the adaptability that is the hallmark of the best

Sruthi Ravindranath in Bengaluru08-Apr-20194:19

Rabada’s mantra for a perfect yorker

An astounding spell to defend 10 runs in a Super Over: check. Dismiss the likes of David Warner, Andre Russell and Virat Kohli in pressure situations: check. Get three wickets in an over and finish with your career-best T20 figures: check.This season, Kagiso Rabada seems well-placed to conquer the IPL frontier.Three years ago, with his relentless pace and sharp bowling, a 20-year-old Rabada was one of those exciting bowlers the world couldn’t get enough of. By 2016, he looked set to be an all-format star for South Africa, and was touted as the future leader of their pace attack. He looked primed for an IPL deal then, but opted for a county stint with Kent instead. “He’s still got loads of years to play in the IPL,” his national captain Faf du Plessis had said of his move.A middling performance in the T20 World Cup that year was followed by an impressive county season, and some scintillating Test and ODI performances. An IPL deal soon came calling, with Delhi Daredevils (now Capitals) scooping him up for INR 5 crore (nearly 10-million Rand) for the 2017 season, turning Rabada into an overnight millionaire.But for someone who came with a big reputation and deeds to match, Rabada’s performances in IPL 2017 were below-par. In his first outing in the tournament, he contributed more with the bat than the ball. In six innings that season, he finished with just six wickets. For someone whose death-bowling skills were raved about, his numbers at that phase were particularly unimpressive, with just two wickets at an economy rate of 11 and an average of 40.5. His chance at redemption in the tournament in 2018 was stalled due to an injury.Kagiso Rabada is elated after dismissing Chris Lynn•BCCIRabada has now come back to the IPL, having added 157 more international wickets and further top honours since that 2017 season. And in IPL 2019, he already has 11 wickets in six games, and is currently on top of the bowling charts. Even better are his figures at the death, where he’s picked 10 wickets at an economy of 8.65. These numbers are a testament to the “world-class” tag he’s been carrying around for the last few years. And that’s not counting the memorable Super Over against Russell, and Kolkata Knight Riders, where he bowled six yorkers while successfully defending 10 runs.How does he do it? If you ask Rabada, it’s not that difficult – apparently.”A yorker can be a high-pressure delivery but it’s really very simple,” Rabada says. “All you have to do is practise it – as simple as that. A yorker is an effort ball, definitely, because you are trying to spear it in, in the first six to beat the batter for pace. But I wouldn’t say that it is too energy-sapping. I don’t think so. It’s like bowling a good-length ball at a good intensity. You just bowl the yorker at a good intensity.”But despite the ‘simplicity’ of yorkers, Rabada showed the quality the best bowlers have: adapting to conditions. On a two-paced pitch at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium on Sunday, he opted for slower balls and cutters, eschewing his affinity for the fast and straight balls.”This was a quick and bouncy wicket, similar to Mumbai. It was stopping a little bit,” he said. “But it wasn’t bad for the batsmen to play on. Coming to India, not all pitches are cliche Indian wickets here. Of course, there is turn, which means you can use your slower balls because they can grip. All in all, when playing in India, you know there’s dry conditions, so you have to use your cutters because they work.”After clocking upwards of 145 kmph in the first two deliveries he bowled, he had AB de Villiers hole out to a well-disguised slower ball. He almost got Kohli at the end of the eighth over when the Royal Challengers’ captain had mistimed a pull off a pacy short one, with the ball looping off the toe-end of the bat just above Rabada and falling safely behind him. He wouldn’t be denied for long though, and the very next ball that Kohli faced off Rabada – the start of the 18th over – he was out. Rabada followed that up with the wickets of Akshdeep Nath and Pawan Negi in the same over – both removed by the short ball – to finish his destructive spell.”It’s always gold to get wickets in T20 cricket,” he said. “All you try and do is get the ball in a good area, whatever ball you’re trying to bowl, (try to ensure that) the batsman is going to make the mistake. You’re not actually trying to get the batter out. You try to see where he’s trying to score first of all. He has to take the risk especially in the 18th over. It helps with all the analysis and reading the play at the moment, but things just happened for me. Another time, they could’ve taken six ones and it would have been a different game. But in T20 cricket you want to get wickets and it happened for me that over. All I tried to do was to keep it simple.”In a year when his team are aiming to turn everything around – they started with the name and hope to end with vastly different results than they’ve got in seasons past – Rabada’s ability to get the best out of himself and churn out match-winning spells will be crucial for Capitals.

Smart Stats – Behrendorff the standout performer in Australia win

Aaron Finch got the man of the match award, but his contribution to the win was lower than that of Australia’s new-ball duo

ESPNcricinfo Stats Team25-Jun-2019Australia recorded their sixth win of the 2019 World Cup, defeating England by 64 runs at Lord’s to seal a semi-final spot – the first to get there. Aaron Finch got the Man of the Match award, but ESPNcricinfo’s Smart Stats show that he was only the third most influential player for Australia, behind Jason Behrendorff and Mitchell Starc.Finch was the first to make a major impact on the game, of course, with his century. In the England chase, Behrendorff picked up five wickets and Starc’s four finished the game. According to our Smart numbers, Behrendorff contributed 19.68% to the win, followed by Starc with 18.46%, and Finch 16.23%.ESPNcricinfo LtdSmart Stats takes into account not only the runs and wickets, but also checks the context and situation of the match in which those runs were scored or wickets taken. It also takes into account the quality of the opposition batsmen and bowlers against whom runs were scored or wickets picked.Watch on Hotstar (India only): Jason Behrendorff’s five-wicket haulBehrendorff bowled six overs at a stretch in his first spell at the start of the England innings, sending back James Vince in the first over and conceding only 26 runs. The required rate had gone to 6.23 by the end of it, after being 5.72 at the start of the innings. He changed ends to bowl his seventh over immediately and got Jonny Bairstow’s wicket. Starc did the honours at the other end, getting the key wickets of Joe Root and Eoin Morgan, and England were four down within 15 overs. Starc then got the key wicket of Ben Stokes in the 37th over to tilt the game completely Australia’s way, before Behrendorff helped finish off the tail.Finch played the anchor’s role in the first innings. He went at a strike rate of 86.20, but his Smart Runs were 105 and Smart Strike Rate was 90.78.

It's been the World Cup of the yorker, and we love it

The defining delivery of the tournament has had some superb purveyors this year, who have used it to deadly effect

Andrew Fidel Fernando09-Jul-2019They know it’s coming, you know it’s coming, the commentators know, as do thousands in the stands. A deep drumbeat resounds in collective minds, going faster and faster and faster. A bowler on a warpath to the crease, wind rushing by. A vortex of limbs, a slightly angled arm and a diagonal seam. In response, a raised bat, late on the shot, despite prior knowledge. It dips. Then it tails.Bails still in mid-air, bat dropped in despair. An eruption. A firework. A howl of joy.The yorker.Is there a greater sight in this sport? In any sport? Zing stumps and bails might be immovable when wimpy top-of-off-stump deliveries make contact, but there’s no way they are not outright exploding in all their flashing red glory for an on-target yorker.ALSO WATCH: Michael Hussey shows how to tackle yorkersIn a way, light-up woodwork does not seem like celebration enough. There should be a thunderous yorker klaxon, a blast of technicolour confetti, and lightning in the skies whenever a bowler sends bails flying with this ball. Teams should have specific celebrations for yorker wickets. Tens of thousands of paying spectators should be simultaneously launched from spring-loaded seats, ten metres into the air, for the benefit of the television audience.ESPNcricinfo LtdNothing has defined the 2019 World Cup like the yorker. Not even, hard as it tried, bad weather. Everywhere you looked, almost every team had an outstanding purveyor of this stuff. Mitchell Starc phased one through alternate dimensions and right into poor Ben Stokes’ unsuspecting off stump in a particularly high-profile entry into the great halls of yorkerdom. Lockie Ferguson roughed Faf du Plessis up with a bouncer at the throat before rattling his off stump – the old-school, sepia-tinted, one-two combo. Trent Boult, conjurer of swing, took an entire hat-trick worth of yorkers (one was technically a very low full-toss, but let’s please not nitpick). Dawlat Zadran, Jason Holder, Stokes himself, Mohammed Saifuddin and even Bhuvneshwar Kumar all reaped wickets from the delivery, before Shaheen Afridi, the freshest fast-bowling phenomenon from Pakistan, the spiritual home of the yorker, did right by the tournament, and the craft, by signing off with a pair of imperious yorker wickets of his own.

But of course, it was someone else who delivered the most consequential deliveries of the World Cup. It was the prevailing granddaddy of the yorker who defibrillated this tournament, bringing it to gasping life when it seemed set on a long, lifeless trudge to the semi-finals, and what did he do it with but, of course, the yorker.Offerings from the younger, faster bowlers might have been flashier, but Lasith Malinga’s are the yorkers you want to grow old with. They are still quick enough when required, deliciously slow when you need them to be, dipping deviously, and reverse-swinging not from side to side but right into the ground, such is the force generated by his singular action. Out of bowlers who have taken wickets from bona-fide yorkers – ones that pitch exactly in the blockhole, and not a few inches further up or down – no one has more dismissals this tournament than Malinga’s five.ALSO READ: Mitchell Starc: chained to his yorker and liberated by itThis is a sublime resurgence, because thanks to T20 cricket, the yorker was very recently deemed to be going out of vogue. It is too high-risk a delivery, analysts said, because if a bowler even slightly under-pitches, a batsman merely sits deep in his crease and clobbers what is now a half-volley way down the ground. Other batsmen have learned to drill it through the off side. Yet more – the audacious ones – have begun to scoop it over their shoulders, to the fine-leg boundary.In the 2015 World Cup, yorkers were hit for almost a run a ball, and yielded a wicket only once in every 26.4 deliveries, but this time they have been vastly more profitable for bowlers. The batting strike rate against the delivery at this World Cup has been 34% lower than it had been four years ago, and the yorker has brought a wicket at an astounding rate of once every 11.2 deliveries.Malinga’s yorkers have claimed the wickets of Steven Smith, Quinton de Kock, Jos Buttler, Dawlat Zadran and Hamid Hassan this World Cup•Getty ImagesAll this with the finest yorker bowler in existence yet to bowl a truly memorable one. Jasprit Bumrah has been slinging them down with the accuracy of some overpowered video-game freak, furious pace and all, but has only removed two batsmen with it. Perhaps batsmen are more wary against him. More likely, they have been lucky. Or is Bumrah saving his yorker wickets for the knockouts?Whether this yorker wave is sustainable remains to be seen. Once data has been accrued across franchise T20 tournaments for another year or so, we’ll know whether this World Cup has been a dazzling blip or the start of a long-term renaissance. What we know for sure, is that we have been in the midst of outstanding yorker bowlers, some of whose teams are still alive in this tournament. Starc is there, as are Boult and Ferguson, while Bumrah also lurks. It would only be right if Jofra Archer delivered a stupendous one of his own.Bouncers are a spectacle too, but they risk bodily harm, and so you often sympathise with the assailed. Yorkers, more than any other fast-bowling delivery, bestow a sense of professional incompetence upon the defeated batsman. It’s rebellious fun, because in an era of outsize ODI averages, an expanding repertoire of shots, and bats bigger than batting brains, batsmen are basically the Man.Do you want to be on the side of the Man? No? To hell with those jerks. You’ve got to love a yorker.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus